 When procedures change, stop and reassess the risk.
| |
When to Stop and Reassess the Risk
 Certain
indicators (e.g., procedural changes) should cause the employee to stop and
review the safety aspects of their procedure — even if it is a familiar
procedure. Hazards may then exist that are not fully recognized. These indicators
include:
 |
New procedures, processes or tests even if they
are very similar to older practices.
|
 |
A change or substitution of any of the
ingredient chemicals in a procedure.
|
 |
A substantial change in the amount of
chemicals used (scale-up of experimental procedures); usually one
should review safety practices if the volume of chemicals used
increases by 200%.
|
 |
A failure of any of the pieces of equipment
used in the process, especially safeguards such as chemical fume
hoods.
|
 |
Unexpected experimental results (such as a
pressure increase, increased reaction rates, unanticipated
by-products). When an experiment's result is different from the
predicted, a review of how the new result may affect safety
practices should be made.
|
 |
Chemical odors, illness in the laboratory staff
that may be related to chemical exposure, or other indicators of a
failure in engineered safeguards.
|

|
The occurrence of any of these conditions should
cause the researcher to pause, evaluate the safety implications
of these changes or results using the risk assessment process,
make changes as necessary, and proceed cautiously. If needed, call
the Occupational Health and Safety Section for assistance.
|
|